car sure would be interesting to drive, will be like a diesel, absolute bucketloads of torque to kick you in the ass, then you have to change gear.StazzyBabyYeah wrote:It's the word bombshell :P
Max. output 50 kW
Max. torque 518 Nm , per motor. 180km/hr, Is that the factory cut or is that it's full flat speed?
Electric cars are looking better and better
Get out the tissues for this one
-
- Newcomer
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 7:09 pm
- Location: Mackay, QLD
- SpidersWeb
- postwhore!
- Posts: 1984
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 2:29 am
- Location: Wellington, NZ
except that one doesn't have a gearbox :)CussCuss wrote:car sure would be interesting to drive, will be like a diesel, absolute bucketloads of torque to kick you in the ass, then you have to change gear.StazzyBabyYeah wrote:It's the word bombshell :P
Max. output 50 kW
Max. torque 518 Nm , per motor. 180km/hr, Is that the factory cut or is that it's full flat speed?
Electric cars are looking better and better
1997 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IV 4G63BT
1996 Nissan Maxima VQ30DE (for sale, suit someone who likes the feel of boats when driving)
1996 Nissan Maxima VQ30DE (for sale, suit someone who likes the feel of boats when driving)
-
- my mangina paid for my staz
- Posts: 2129
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:23 pm
- Location: Brisbane
I agree re gearbox comment, i think thats one advantage of electric motors is they have instant torque and would not require a gearbox.SpidersWeb wrote:except that one doesn't have a gearbox :)CussCuss wrote:car sure would be interesting to drive, will be like a diesel, absolute bucketloads of torque to kick you in the ass, then you have to change gear.StazzyBabyYeah wrote:It's the word bombshell :P
Max. output 50 kW
Max. torque 518 Nm , per motor. 180km/hr, Is that the factory cut or is that it's full flat speed?
Electric cars are looking better and better
- SpidersWeb
- postwhore!
- Posts: 1984
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 2:29 am
- Location: Wellington, NZ
Its a little flawed though.
I mean your average home power outlet is only rated at 2kW, that car is 200kW from the word go. So to run a 12 second quater mile, you'd need to put your car on charge for 20 minutes.
I kind of like being able to spend 5 minutes at a servo, and having enough power to freely roam around the country :) Also its not fixing the problem, it takes carbon monoxide off the roads but power stations will need to power the cars, so more hydrodams, more coal, more nuclear etc Just shifts the problem somewhere you cant see it.
It'd be an absolutely amazing rally car though.
I mean your average home power outlet is only rated at 2kW, that car is 200kW from the word go. So to run a 12 second quater mile, you'd need to put your car on charge for 20 minutes.
I kind of like being able to spend 5 minutes at a servo, and having enough power to freely roam around the country :) Also its not fixing the problem, it takes carbon monoxide off the roads but power stations will need to power the cars, so more hydrodams, more coal, more nuclear etc Just shifts the problem somewhere you cant see it.
It'd be an absolutely amazing rally car though.
1997 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IV 4G63BT
1996 Nissan Maxima VQ30DE (for sale, suit someone who likes the feel of boats when driving)
1996 Nissan Maxima VQ30DE (for sale, suit someone who likes the feel of boats when driving)
the same argument came up in another forum. That power can be done from green sources, you can have solar panels on your roof and i think there is an electric company that you can use that is all green. 250km would get most people to work and back so there youve got your perfect daily driver. That and stuff like air cars is where the future lies.SpidersWeb wrote:Its a little flawed though.
I mean your average home power outlet is only rated at 2kW, that car is 200kW from the word go. So to run a 12 second quater mile, you'd need to put your car on charge for 20 minutes.
I kind of like being able to spend 5 minutes at a servo, and having enough power to freely roam around the country :) Also its not fixing the problem, it takes carbon monoxide off the roads but power stations will need to power the cars, so more hydrodams, more coal, more nuclear etc Just shifts the problem somewhere you cant see it.
It'd be an absolutely amazing rally car though.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests