Very interesting read (Comparisons between 2.0 and 2.4 DOHC)

Website · Post by **WidebodyWoody** » Fri Feb 17, 2012 3:23 pm

This has overlayed dyno results of a 2.0 and 2.4 in both the torque and HP ranges, same gear. It shows spool times, and also has overlays of time not just torque so it shows duration of spool up as well. Very useful.

Check it out.

http://forums.evolutionm.net/evo-engine ... -2-0l.html

thrash · Post by **thrash** » Wed Feb 22, 2012 4:49 pm

hmmm.. makes me hope i need to rebuild my 2 litre in the near future....

enthuzed · Post by **enthuzed** » Sun Mar 11, 2012 6:52 pm

There is no replacement for displacement! And a psychotic snail helps even more!

Website · Post by **WidebodyWoody** » Sun Mar 11, 2012 10:24 pm

Well I would argue that the replacement for 0.2 litres of displacement is the extra cam and the bigger and better flowing ports. :beer

Sargeant_Khan · Post by **Sargeant_Khan** » Tue Mar 13, 2012 10:51 pm

enthuzed wrote:There is no replacement for displacement! And a psychotic snail helps even more!

A supercharger is a perfect replacement for displacement. Essentially that's exactly what it does.

enthuzed · Post by **enthuzed** » Tue Mar 13, 2012 11:14 pm

It was a throw away comment guys.

Super and turbo chargers just jam more air into the pump (engine).

Less boost and less strain on the engine for the same result makes sense to me.

fugazi · Post by **fugazi** » Wed Mar 14, 2012 5:00 am

Sargeant_Khan wrote:
enthuzed wrote:There is no replacement for displacement! And a psychotic snail helps even more!
A supercharger is a perfect replacement for displacement. Essentially that's exactly what it does.

Well... I see what you mean, but a SS takes a lot of power from the crank too... compared to a turbo that "onley" makes a bit of backpressure for the piston's exh.stroke.

enthuzed wrote:It was a throw away comment guys.

Super and turbo chargers just jam more air into the pump (engine).

Less boost and less strain on the engine for the same result makes sense to me.

Throw away or not... It's true!
A 2litre, 150hp N/A-motor will make ~300hp on 1bar of boost.
A 2,3 litre 200hp N/A-motor would pass 300hp before 0,7bar. With a nicer torque-curve!

And a unopened BMW M60B40 V8 singelturbo and E85, makes 640WHP/818WNm@1,1bar in a Volvo 242 -75... sleeper? Hilarious?
But I guess that's OT and not very interesting... :D

enthuzed · Post by **enthuzed** » Wed Mar 14, 2012 8:02 am

fugazi wrote: And a unopened BMW M60B40 V8 singelturbo and E85, makes 640WHP/818WNm@1,1bar in a Volvo 242 -75... sleeper? Hilarious?
But I guess that's OT and not very interesting... :D

enthuzed · Post by **enthuzed** » Wed Mar 14, 2012 8:11 am

Why'd you hide it?
Yes it's off topic but it is interesting...

Check the speedo operating almost like a tacho!

fugazi · Post by **fugazi** » Wed Mar 14, 2012 6:38 pm

Just teasing.... LOL
Here you can buy a 540-740 beemer from about 20000 SEK (<2800AUD)
I think it would fit in a Staz...

thrash · Post by **thrash** » Wed Mar 14, 2012 6:44 pm

if i ever get another project, one of the considerations will be an E36 318is to put a supercharged M62 3.5L v8 into

Austarion

Very interesting read (Comparisons between 2.0 and 2.4 DOHC)

Very interesting read (Comparisons between 2.0 and 2.4 DOHC)

Who is online