wheel size differences

A place for general discussion. Catch up with mates, post pics, or if you just want to pick on e-thugs.
Post Reply
decoy
Let Me Out!
Posts: 4424
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2003 3:03 pm
Location: Far from home
Contact:

wheel size differences

Post by decoy »

car feels more torquey now? would changing from 17s to 15s do this? i can't see the overall diameter being that much different. but thinking it could be the change in wheels cos it handles like crap now (traction). could just be that i havn't driven in a long time tho. will have to test when i clear defect and put the 17s straight on after a drive and see how it feels
_
_________________
User avatar
Alspos
Flucking kwankers
Posts: 4107
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 2:09 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Post by Alspos »

Put them side by side and see what the diff in height is. Probably more than you expect.
User avatar
mrb1
gtpumps.com.au
Posts: 1559
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 1:35 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Post by mrb1 »

Yes check it because it can be quite deceptive just looking at them. Measure the rolling diameter and compare them.
decoy
Let Me Out!
Posts: 4424
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2003 3:03 pm
Location: Far from home
Contact:

Post by decoy »

so if the rolling diameter is bigger, i'll be missing out on off-boost performance, but getting better traction and handling?
_
_________________
CussCuss
6pack esky
Posts: 1294
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 1:34 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by CussCuss »

no, the reason why you appear to be getting better traction is that your putting less torque to the ground. If the rolling diameter is bigger it will have a highter top speed and be slower accellerating.
User avatar
NXTIME
Registry Nazi
Posts: 2972
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney, NSW

Post by NXTIME »

What are the different tyre sizes of the 17's and the 15's?
Please register your vehicle details on the AUSTRALIAN STARION REGISTRY <HERE>


1 x 3.2T
1 x 2.8T
3 x 2.6T's
1 x 2.0T
decoy
Let Me Out!
Posts: 4424
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2003 3:03 pm
Location: Far from home
Contact:

Post by decoy »

17s have 235s front and back, so i thought thatd be helping with the traction, plus the low profile i can corner a lot better. 15s have 195 or 205s i think, and like to squeel on corners. can feel a bit more tyre roll in them, but, the car feels torque'ier. as far as i can tell, havn't driven in a while
_
_________________
decoy
Let Me Out!
Posts: 4424
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2003 3:03 pm
Location: Far from home
Contact:

Post by decoy »

CussCuss wrote:no, the reason why you appear to be getting better traction is that your putting less torque to the ground.
all the better reason to rev higher :D
CussCuss wrote:If the rolling diameter is bigger it will have a higher top speed and be slower accellerating.
i'm not really fussed over my top speed :( might have to attempt both of best worlds with even lower profile tyres on the 17s?
_
_________________
StarionBoy
i need to paint my car!
Posts: 374
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 9:42 pm
Location: Ballarat

Post by StarionBoy »

what about the other number in the tyre size, the 17's will be 235/??/17 and the 15's will be 195/??/15

the middle number is the one from the edge of the rim to the edge of the tyre so then you can see the difference.. 235 and 195 are only how wide the tyres are (what you see when looking from the front or back)

and if your interested in how much out your speedo will be, on this site you can put in the stock tyre size and new tyre size and it will tell you how much out the speedo will be..
http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html
CussCuss
6pack esky
Posts: 1294
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 1:34 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by CussCuss »

yes my post was in the fact that the tyre widths and compounds were equal, you will get better traction with wider tyres ofcourse. The 17's will also increase the weight that the car has to spin if they are heavyer (usually are) think of it like putting more weight on the flywheel.

Putting a 3.9 LSD would offset the 17's to a degree, if you want the 17's on there i would be putting near identical rolling diameter (whatever is closest without going over) and a 3.9 LSD.

as Starionboy said, we need to know the profile of the tyres and the width of the wheels then i can give you an ideal combination.
Chris 83JA
almost postwhore
Posts: 1015
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 12:02 pm
Location: Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
Contact:

Post by Chris 83JA »

Also, you may want to try weighing one of the wheels and comparing them, the 17s could be having an effect like a heavier flywheel
decoy
Let Me Out!
Posts: 4424
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2003 3:03 pm
Location: Far from home
Contact:

Post by decoy »

Chris 83JA wrote: the 17s could be having an effect like a heavier flywheel
also having an effect of making the car look sexy :D

current ones on the 15s are x60h and the 17s had 40s i beleive. yeh i could imagine the simmons weighing a bit more... the sacrafice for 3peice dish :D

as for me getting a a 3.9.... ok :D only if its lsd tho :D and $500 :D
_
_________________
User avatar
NXTIME
Registry Nazi
Posts: 2972
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney, NSW

Post by NXTIME »

If you have 195/60/15's, then with the 235/40/17's the radius will be out by 0.8% (over). Ie, if your speedo reads 100kph, then you will be actually travelling at 100.8 kph.

If they are 205/60/15's, then the 17's will be 1.1% less the 15's radius. Ie, your speedo will be over by 1.1% (actual speed will be 98.9 when speedo shows 100 kph).

Either way, it is pretty much the same acceleration and speed-wise. Traction is a different story ;)
Please register your vehicle details on the AUSTRALIAN STARION REGISTRY <HERE>


1 x 3.2T
1 x 2.8T
3 x 2.6T's
1 x 2.0T
decoy
Let Me Out!
Posts: 4424
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2003 3:03 pm
Location: Far from home
Contact:

Post by decoy »

shweeeet
_
_________________
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 73 guests