Lumpy idle

For all your twin cam conversion questions and hints
mizuno man
Dorifto!
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 1:49 pm
Location: Brisbane

Lumpy idle

Post by mizuno man »

Hey guys
I did a TC conversion many years ago.
Car has been sitting idle for 5 years and have decided to get it up and running with a bit more poke.

Orignal conversion involved runing the VR4 ECU.
Wide block
Machined decompressed pistons
Hi flow TD05
Vr4 Intercooler
Vr4 T/B, intake manifold, blue top 450cc injectors
Balance shafts removed.

Now I have a new GT2860 garrett turbo
BC 272 cams with ajustable casm timimg fitted and running again with VR$ ECU & MAF.

I have more to do on this thing like a HaLtech p1000 sport and additional tuning, but has anyone experienced a nice lump to thier idle in any TC conversion?

It was present when it was first built it but after a years of being driven hard I suspect a vacume leak developed and it use to go scavanging.

This lump is more like a tame buzless rotary type of lump, not a WRX bleep.
redzone
racking my brains
Posts: 5900
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 10:46 pm
Location: sunshine coast qld
Contact:

Post by redzone »

272's will definitely give u a lumpy idle ;)

rad's car has 272/264 and it's pretty rough..

my gemini has 290 degrees duration and sounds like a PP 13B lol
Fibreglass airdams $370, fibreglass front bumpers $260, reco drag links $165, alloy radiators $925 (unpolished), h/l switch rebuilds $125, all plus freight.
Coxs Automotive (07)54433507 3/5 Service st Maroochydore Q

www.facebook.com/coxsautomotive
www.coxsautomotive.com.au
User avatar
MR Bender
Enthusiast king
Posts: 754
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2007 8:01 pm
Location: Perth Western Australia (SOR)

Post by MR Bender »

yer the 272 are pretty lumpy i have them in my car and it sounds pretty cool.
Bite my shiny metal ass!!!

Russell Coight: Some of the animals are nocturnal, so the best time to see them is at night. Only you can't see them, because it's dark.
mizuno man
Dorifto!
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 1:49 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by mizuno man »

I may be wrong but isn't the lump of an engine usually created by the cam lob overlap.

I am just surprised because it is similar to the lump I use to get out my mini years ago where you have to overlap cam lobs to get max intake .

I suppose thats where the adjustable cam timing will eliminate the over lap of the cams
User avatar
WANTSOM
Pushing my luck
Posts: 2115
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2004 1:43 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by WANTSOM »

The overlap causes the lumpiness. Adjusting the cam wheels can induce/reduce it too to some degree.
Never argue with an idiot, it brings you down to their level and they beat you with experience.
Adriano
I've been here before
Posts: 236
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 3:21 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by Adriano »

Seems like a very unusual combo, those cams are way too big for the turbo you are running. It is a 300hp turbo with 600hp cams
mizuno man
Dorifto!
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 1:49 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by mizuno man »

Adriano wrote:Seems like a very unusual combo, those cams are way too big for the turbo you are running. It is a 300hp turbo with 600hp cams
Adriano thanks for your input and concern about the combination that I am running, but where do you get your HP numbers.

The Garrett web site indicates that @ 17psi the GT2860 will produce 370hp

The Brian Crower web site has a 4g63 with a T3 @ 22psi produced max 425hp a far cry from the 600hp your quoting.

I think this set up will be a pretty good balance but isuppose only time will tell.

I should have more info on dyno results shortly.
Adriano
I've been here before
Posts: 236
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 3:21 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by Adriano »

Im basing my comments on a 2860 being a stock size sr20 turbo, which max out around 210rwkw. Ive got a 2876 which is much larger and it is rated at 440hp

Im running 272's in my gtr which is really too big for it at 850hp, but it is a different motor. 264's would have been a better choice for me.

Stock evo3 cams are good for over 240rwkw when dialled in correctly.
User avatar
thrash
Austarion Occupant
Posts: 3028
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:09 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by thrash »

Adriano wrote: Stock evo3 cams are good for over 240rwkw when dialled in correctly.
can i derail this thread ever so slightly? are stock evo3 cams the same as vr4 cams?
quest wrote:
WANTSOM wrote:Personally, I find sloppy boxes very unsatisfying. I like them tight and taught to the point that if you dont have to push to get it in then its probably too old and time to get a new one :P
don't try explaining that to her tho..... just leave. lol
Adriano
I've been here before
Posts: 236
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 3:21 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by Adriano »

No, bigger, cant remember the specs exactly, but ive had plenty of vr4's making over 200rwkw on the dyno with stock cams and camwheels
redzone
racking my brains
Posts: 5900
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 10:46 pm
Location: sunshine coast qld
Contact:

Post by redzone »

Adriano wrote:Im basing my comments on a 2860 being a stock size sr20 turbo, which max out around 210rwkw. Ive got a 2876 which is much larger and it is rated at 440hp

Im running 272's in my gtr which is really too big for it at 850hp, but it is a different motor. 264's would have been a better choice for me.

Stock evo3 cams are good for over 240rwkw when dialled in correctly.
GT2860RS is a disco potato, T25G is an S13 SR20 turbo, S14/15 used a T28 in ball or plain bearing depending where they came from..

Disco Potato's are a little weapon of a turbo, looking at about 250kw ATW from one cranked right up.. they're only one step below a 2871R..
Fibreglass airdams $370, fibreglass front bumpers $260, reco drag links $165, alloy radiators $925 (unpolished), h/l switch rebuilds $125, all plus freight.
Coxs Automotive (07)54433507 3/5 Service st Maroochydore Q

www.facebook.com/coxsautomotive
www.coxsautomotive.com.au
Adriano
I've been here before
Posts: 236
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 3:21 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by Adriano »

BUt he doesnt have an rs, or does he?
dirtygalant
nearly postwhore
Posts: 1446
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 7:27 pm
Location: Sunny Brisbane Australia!

Post by dirtygalant »

Evo 3 cams are the same as VR-4 cams as far as Mitsubishi CAPS is concerned, as the VR-4 part number has been superseded by the Evo 3 part number. The lift and duration is also the same between the two. It is the Evo 1 which has smaller lift and duration compared to the VR-4 and Evo 2/3 cams. This is comparing JDM to JDM models though, for all I know the AUDM VR-4 cams could be different again, but the JDM VR-4 cams certainly are the same specs as Evo 3.

Here are the cam specs for various 4G63s:

Inhalation lift quantity (mm)
Inspiration angle (degrees)
Exhaust lift quantity (mm)
Exhaust action angle (degrees)

RVR SSG - 8.5 252 8.5 252
Evo 1 - 8.5 252 8.5 252
RVR HSG - 9.5 252 9.5 252
Evo 2/3 - 9.5 252 9.5 252
VR4 - 9.5 252 9.5 252
AMG - 10 260 9.5 264
ImageImage
E39A Galant VR-4 Evolution | A164A Eterna GSR | 6G72 RWD Conversion Forum
User avatar
greenstaz82
Mine is bigger than yours
Posts: 275
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2004 8:29 pm
Location: brisbane

Post by greenstaz82 »

ive got a pair of tomei cams in mine there 260 degree with 11.5 mil lift . its lumpy at idle and a bitch to drive a low speeds , it also comes down to the tune i think , they call it a fat idle or something when they put more fuel in at idle .
User avatar
thrash
Austarion Occupant
Posts: 3028
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:09 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by thrash »

thanks adriano and dg :beer

back to the thread, if you have 272 cams but are running a stock vr4 ecu, that might be your problem.
quest wrote:
WANTSOM wrote:Personally, I find sloppy boxes very unsatisfying. I like them tight and taught to the point that if you dont have to push to get it in then its probably too old and time to get a new one :P
don't try explaining that to her tho..... just leave. lol
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests