lowering a starion

Technical questions and ideas regarding how your Starion looks inside and out, bodykits to stereos.
TOMSUN
Group buy King
Posts: 2391
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 10:24 am
Location: Sydney (Liverpool)

Post by TOMSUN »

thrash wrote:like going straight despite you turning the steering wheel?
thrash wrote:or continuing to turn after you've brought the steerign wheel back to normal position?
Neither. Bump steer is when you hit a bump and the due to bad steering geometry/modifications, the car wants to turn a different direction.
Someone else might be able to describe it better?
1985 JB Starion #157
RiceThief
my mangina paid for my staz
Posts: 2129
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:23 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by RiceThief »

TOMSUN wrote:Neither. Bump steer is when you hit a bump and the due to bad steering geometry/modifications, the car wants to turn a different direction.
Someone else might be able to describe it better?
I think enthuzed is refering to hitting the bump stops though, which loads up the chassis and either puts you in a spin or off line.
Starions are a disease, the only cure is poverty.

Project Grand Sport Racing Five
TOMSUN
Group buy King
Posts: 2391
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 10:24 am
Location: Sydney (Liverpool)

Post by TOMSUN »

RiceThief wrote:
TOMSUN wrote:Neither. Bump steer is when you hit a bump and the due to bad steering geometry/modifications, the car wants to turn a different direction.
Someone else might be able to describe it better?
I think enthuzed is refering to hitting the bump stops though, which loads up the chassis and either puts you in a spin or off line.
That sounds even worse than bump steer!
1985 JB Starion #157
OLD FART
Austarion Occupant
Posts: 3448
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 1:34 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by OLD FART »

Google bump steer .Pedders have an excellent demo video
I've had mine since 03 07 92
85 JB 2323cc DOHC 4G63
THE OLDER I GET THE FASTER I WAS
GROWING OLD IS MANDATORY GROWING UP IS OPTIONAL
enthuzed
Austarion Occupant
Posts: 3578
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 1:21 pm
Location: Melborno
Contact:

Post by enthuzed »

RiceThief wrote:
TOMSUN wrote:Neither. Bump steer is when you hit a bump and the due to bad steering geometry/modifications, the car wants to turn a different direction.
Someone else might be able to describe it better?
I think enthuzed is refering to hitting the bump stops though, which loads up the chassis and either puts you in a spin or off line.
Correct RT. Spot on.
Reduce fuel costs by 15-20% & cut emissions by 1/3rd...
Increase engine performance & prolong engine life...
How?
Click the website button below & watch the 3 minute video.
User avatar
thrash
Austarion Occupant
Posts: 3028
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:09 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by thrash »

TOMSUN wrote:
thrash wrote:like going straight despite you turning the steering wheel?
thrash wrote:or continuing to turn after you've brought the steering wheel back to normal position?
Neither. Bump steer is when you hit a bump and the due to bad steering geometry/modifications, the car wants to turn a different direction.
Someone else might be able to describe it better?
lol, I was refering to the following:
enthuzed wrote:It's scary stuff the moment the car throws total "unexpected" handling at you. :shock:
both have happened to me. The first is one of the reasons the much advertised "safeness" of fwd compared to rwd is just marketing bullcrap..
quest wrote:
WANTSOM wrote:Personally, I find sloppy boxes very unsatisfying. I like them tight and taught to the point that if you dont have to push to get it in then its probably too old and time to get a new one :P
don't try explaining that to her tho..... just leave. lol
TOMSUN
Group buy King
Posts: 2391
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 10:24 am
Location: Sydney (Liverpool)

Post by TOMSUN »

thrash... I'm going to have to disagree with you on this one.
FWD are safer to drive than RWD. (both being factory and unmodified) I'm sue that this will stir up some comments. But if I had to recommend a platform for a new inexperienced driver I would recommend a FWD.
1985 JB Starion #157
OLD FART
Austarion Occupant
Posts: 3448
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 1:34 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by OLD FART »

Not wanting to start a bun fight only an informed discussion BUT basicly most if not all fwd or rwd cars sold here are set up to understeer or push as this is considered to be the safest option as the inexperienced driver will turn on more lock & hopefully get off the power ( more power in a fwd = more/ terminal understeer ) if the car is running wide however fwd can get lift off oversteer & rwd can get power oversteer if copious amounts of power is applied at the wrong moment.
There is a lot more involved in the way any car responds to driver imput ,camber of the road ,type of surface. steering technique , where and when the brakes & accellerator are applied tyres & preasures ,suspension settings etc etc
I've had mine since 03 07 92
85 JB 2323cc DOHC 4G63
THE OLDER I GET THE FASTER I WAS
GROWING OLD IS MANDATORY GROWING UP IS OPTIONAL
User avatar
thrash
Austarion Occupant
Posts: 3028
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:09 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by thrash »

TOMSUN wrote:thrash... I'm going to have to disagree with you on this one.
FWD are safer to drive than RWD. (both being factory and unmodified) I'm sue that this will stir up some comments. But if I had to recommend a platform for a new inexperienced driver I would recommend a FWD.
See here lies the difference i'm talking about. Saying FWD is safer than RWD is a massive generalisation, and in itself is completely false.

However, the condition you put forth in your second statement is a valid one - for an inexperienced driver, FWD is the safer option in "most" conditions - mostly as long as he or she doesn't drive like a power crazed maniac.. or as long as they aren't in a rush.

To my inexperienced brother, I would never want him behind the wheel of a rwd vehicle, becuase I am 100% sure he'll spin it. Nothing is safe in the wrong hands ;)

But in terms of objective safety where the dynamics of the vehicle are considered, would you still say that fwd is safer than rwd? If you do then we just have to agree to disagree, as I feel that while a rwd vehicle is easier to get into trouble (aka fun) with, it's also easier to get out of trouble with. When the fron wheels of a fwd vehicle slip, you have nothing.. no power, no steering, no braking.. nothing. Regardless of driver skill level, this results in disaster.. This is my reasoning for saying that fwd is no safer than rwd
Last edited by thrash on Tue Feb 02, 2010 12:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
quest wrote:
WANTSOM wrote:Personally, I find sloppy boxes very unsatisfying. I like them tight and taught to the point that if you dont have to push to get it in then its probably too old and time to get a new one :P
don't try explaining that to her tho..... just leave. lol
User avatar
thrash
Austarion Occupant
Posts: 3028
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:09 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by thrash »

on a side note, most inexperienced drivers will brake or accelarate while turning, without even realising.. and in wet weather, this can give disastrous results, regardless of whether it's a fwd or rwd vehicle..

So.. fwd/rwd is really not as important as driver training when we're talking about safety eh? So back to my initial point, the fact that manufacturers advertise fwd as being safer, I stand to say it's all just marketing :)
quest wrote:
WANTSOM wrote:Personally, I find sloppy boxes very unsatisfying. I like them tight and taught to the point that if you dont have to push to get it in then its probably too old and time to get a new one :P
don't try explaining that to her tho..... just leave. lol
toms starion
Big Dorifto
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 8:24 am
Location: adelaide

Post by toms starion »

on topic here ive managed to lower the jb it just sits on top of my tyre on the rear have not yet done the front as im waiting to put my bar on..

heres a pic
User avatar
thrash
Austarion Occupant
Posts: 3028
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:09 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by thrash »

sorry about going off topic :oops:

the pic is missing btw
quest wrote:
WANTSOM wrote:Personally, I find sloppy boxes very unsatisfying. I like them tight and taught to the point that if you dont have to push to get it in then its probably too old and time to get a new one :P
don't try explaining that to her tho..... just leave. lol
WidebodyWoody
Woodwide
Posts: 3133
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 6:24 pm
Location: Gold Coast
Contact:

Post by WidebodyWoody »

Great pic rofl
redzone
racking my brains
Posts: 5900
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 10:46 pm
Location: sunshine coast qld
Contact:

Post by redzone »

Image
Fibreglass airdams $370, fibreglass front bumpers $260, reco drag links $165, alloy radiators $925 (unpolished), h/l switch rebuilds $125, all plus freight.
Coxs Automotive (07)54433507 3/5 Service st Maroochydore Q

www.facebook.com/coxsautomotive
www.coxsautomotive.com.au
TOMSUN
Group buy King
Posts: 2391
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 10:24 am
Location: Sydney (Liverpool)

Post by TOMSUN »

toms starion wrote:on topic here ive managed to lower the jb it just sits on top of my tyre on the rear have not yet done the front as im waiting to put my bar on..

heres a pic
So did you just throw in a set of springs? if so which ones and how much lower is it?

What size/profile tires do you have?
1985 JB Starion #157
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 70 guests