BOV installation
well the funny thing is i took it to an exhaust shop and they said that they wouldnt do it because its kind of pointless unless you have a intercooler setup.... but what difference would it make if you had a front mount???? or is that cause its probs alot easier to install...
its all fun and games till the cops show up... lol
rides at the moment:
97 mirage
82 starion
previous rides::
AC gsr cordia
rides at the moment:
97 mirage
82 starion
previous rides::
AC gsr cordia
Ryan to comply with the ADR'S it has to be plumb back systemiXNAY wrote:id assume 80% of people would also want it for the sound factor alone!
cant you just plumb it back to your turbo inlet to not be wasting compressed air?
To the doubters if they were of no benefit why does Subaru install them at the factory as the bean counters are always looking for ways to maximise the bottom line (profit ) ??????????
Has anyone seen any turbo competition cars without and if there were I think they would be a minority if any
I believe that the main role is to prevent a sudden reverse shockwave when the throttle is snapped shut and slowing the turbo rpms whereas with a BOV the rpms ars much higher so it will spool up faster
Docile where can we see the data to back up your opinion ??????
I AM NOT looking for a verbal stoush only something to back up your opinion and for my enlightenment :)
I've had mine since 03 07 92
85 JB 2323cc DOHC 4G63
THE OLDER I GET THE FASTER I WAS
GROWING OLD IS MANDATORY GROWING UP IS OPTIONAL
85 JB 2323cc DOHC 4G63
THE OLDER I GET THE FASTER I WAS
GROWING OLD IS MANDATORY GROWING UP IS OPTIONAL
The only way(s) i can see reversion killing turbos is either destroying the comp wheel due to the forces(but ive never seen it), or more likely the pressure surges would cause premature wear to the thrust bearings due to the pouding on the end float.(which may explain the excessive end float on my turbo)
No, not the same. Actually i think we are making fairly different points.
In terms of BOV effectiveness in reducing transient response there are arguements both ways. I may be about to try a gtr bov on my starion and datalog the difference in boost rebuild after momentry overrun, however consistency will be difficult.
In terms of BOV effectiveness in reducing transient response there are arguements both ways. I may be about to try a gtr bov on my starion and datalog the difference in boost rebuild after momentry overrun, however consistency will be difficult.
-
- almost postwhore
- Posts: 1131
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:46 pm
- Location: Mackay, QLD, Australia
-
- my mangina paid for my staz
- Posts: 2129
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:23 pm
- Location: Brisbane
The problem with afm and bov are only there if the bov is vented, if it is recirculated after the afm then the air wont be metered, the gtr bov is an example of this. No bov from the factory is vented into the atmosphere whether its a map sensored car or one with an afm obviously for emissions.
As you stated the damage will be in the thrust bearing causing premature play.
As you stated the damage will be in the thrust bearing causing premature play.
Correct anti lag is better for no lag but it's hard on turbos as they have to be changed reguarly =$$$$$$$$$ but how long do you think you would get away with it on the street ???RiceThief wrote:Rally cars run anti lag rather than a bov to keep the turbos spinning . Also larger turbos have bigger problems with reversion than smaller turbos both in terms of stalling the turbo and damaging from the reversion.
I've had mine since 03 07 92
85 JB 2323cc DOHC 4G63
THE OLDER I GET THE FASTER I WAS
GROWING OLD IS MANDATORY GROWING UP IS OPTIONAL
85 JB 2323cc DOHC 4G63
THE OLDER I GET THE FASTER I WAS
GROWING OLD IS MANDATORY GROWING UP IS OPTIONAL
I think it's just further recycled internet forum bollocks. I've never seen a turbo destroyed by one personally. I put the BOV in to see if my turbo was boosting, it was literally in there a day. I think the noise is a bit 'common' now.
1987 Mitsubishi Starion 2.0 Turbo RHD with 88 - 90 engine (?), manual gearbox (MAP Sensor'd).
LSD, Intercooler, ABS, leather interior, air con
LSD, Intercooler, ABS, leather interior, air con
-
- racking my brains
- Posts: 5900
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 10:46 pm
- Location: sunshine coast qld
- Contact:
Adriano wrote:Its because they are idiots. Redzone, what happened to the turbo? Plenty of factory vehicles dont have them without tuebo issue, running more than 20 psi
it was a TC06 high flowed with a T03 wheel that it happened to, was on the orange car, and yes it got about 3mm of end float until the exh wheel contacted the housing. turbo was fine before i boosted it up. used to make an awesome WRC style flutter noise, unfortunately loving that noise cost me a turbo... that turbo was fine running on 14 psi, before i boosted it up when i fitted the 2.4 head. turbo only lasted about 3 months at 20.
compressor surge hammers the shit out of thrust bearings.
also FYI the reason WRC cars can get away with running anti lag and without running BOV's is because they change the frickin turbo's at nearly every service park....
Fibreglass airdams $370, fibreglass front bumpers $260, reco drag links $165, alloy radiators $925 (unpolished), h/l switch rebuilds $125, all plus freight.
Coxs Automotive (07)54433507 3/5 Service st Maroochydore Q
www.facebook.com/coxsautomotive
www.coxsautomotive.com.au
Coxs Automotive (07)54433507 3/5 Service st Maroochydore Q
www.facebook.com/coxsautomotive
www.coxsautomotive.com.au
grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr pshhh
quest wrote:don't try explaining that to her tho..... just leave. lolWANTSOM wrote:Personally, I find sloppy boxes very unsatisfying. I like them tight and taught to the point that if you dont have to push to get it in then its probably too old and time to get a new one :P
From the autospeed article with Nizpro, which JD_Staz linked,
Mitsubishi 't' wheels (circa 2002), ie, 12,14,15,16,19 and 22T wheels are exceptional and shouldn't need a BOV. Same with the new BorgWarner series Turbos, surge lines are so far to the left it puts the Garret wheel designs and maps to shame.
:beer
Firstly, I agree, on some of the really old compressor wheel designs, like the a,b,c and g (circa 1990's) along with the garret t wheels and some gt, wheels then surge will wear our the trust bearings sooner."The fact that people think that they keep the turbo spinning is a problem. The people that suggest this have never had an engine on the dyno and never had a turbo tacho in their hands. What people don't realise is, when you shut off the throttle, you shut off the air supply to the engine - this shuts off the exhaust gasses coming out of the engine. When there is no exhaust flow, there is no energy to keep the turbine spinning - the turbo slows down at an alarming rate.
"If you change gears at quite a good speed, you can actually get a boost spike on changes; if you're trying to hold a constant 30 pounds, when you do a racing change you'll get 32-33 pounds when you crack the throttle open again. If everything's working well, you've got a full head of stream waiting to go into the throttle as soon as it's opened.
"I've done this on a rally car and it was quicker through every timed section without a dump valve.
Mitsubishi 't' wheels (circa 2002), ie, 12,14,15,16,19 and 22T wheels are exceptional and shouldn't need a BOV. Same with the new BorgWarner series Turbos, surge lines are so far to the left it puts the Garret wheel designs and maps to shame.
:beer
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests