JAS's Rebuild and twincam conversion. 302kw atw baby!!!

Display your ride and post power figures, dyno runs, drag and circuit times.
User avatar
Schultz
I like starions
Posts: 139
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 7:00 pm
Location: Kingaroy QLD

Post by Schultz »

The engine bay is that awesome I had to tell you twice. rofl

Sorry about that.
User avatar
thrash
Austarion Occupant
Posts: 3028
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:09 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by thrash »

is that a 1.06 rear housing? doesn't seem super laggy either, but the turbine housing looks huge(!!)
quest wrote:
WANTSOM wrote:Personally, I find sloppy boxes very unsatisfying. I like them tight and taught to the point that if you dont have to push to get it in then its probably too old and time to get a new one :P
don't try explaining that to her tho..... just leave. lol
OLD FART
Austarion Occupant
Posts: 3448
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 1:34 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by OLD FART »

Aaron how fast would your drag car get down the 1/4 with this amount of grunt ??
My trusty slide rule says 400 hp in a 3000 lb car says 11.0 at 120 mph :D
I've had mine since 03 07 92
85 JB 2323cc DOHC 4G63
THE OLDER I GET THE FASTER I WAS
GROWING OLD IS MANDATORY GROWING UP IS OPTIONAL
RiceThief
my mangina paid for my staz
Posts: 2129
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:23 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by RiceThief »

thrash wrote:is that a 1.06 rear housing? doesn't seem super laggy either, but the turbine housing looks huge(!!)
Pretty sure its a 0.82 from what Jas said on austarion, power is about right for it.
Starions are a disease, the only cure is poverty.

Project Grand Sport Racing Five
User avatar
1320ft
almost postwhore
Posts: 1071
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 8:33 pm
Location: St Andrews NSW

Post by 1320ft »

OLD FART wrote:Aaron how fast would your drag car get down the 1/4 with this amount of grunt ??
My trusty slide rule says 400 hp in a 3000 lb car says 11.0 at 120 mph :D
Based on assuming the gold car has stereo etc, so I went in at 2900 lbs, it should run 11.11 @ 121.40 MPH

I want to get my car down to 2600 lbs & with 600 hp should run 9.45 @ 143.52 MPH.

Love this car though, love the build quality.

Have to have a look and a ride when I'm over for work.
The Forum Parts Guy

www.vibrantperformance.com for all your performance fabrication needs

IRS OUTLAW, 2.3L VR4 Powered X235 Drag Car

Here to run out of your life & take all your money!
OLD FART
Austarion Occupant
Posts: 3448
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 1:34 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by OLD FART »

1320ft wrote:
OLD FART wrote:Aaron how fast would your drag car get down the 1/4 with this amount of grunt ??
My trusty slide rule says 400 hp in a 3000 lb car says 11.0 at 120 mph :D
Based on assuming the gold car has stereo etc, so I went in at 2900 lbs, it should run 11.11 @ 121.40 MPH

I want to get my car down to 2600 lbs & with 600 hp should run 9.45 @ 143.52 MPH.

Love this car though, love the build quality.

Have to have a look and a ride when I'm over for work.
Have seen it a few years ago and to my eyes it was perfect :beer
I've had mine since 03 07 92
85 JB 2323cc DOHC 4G63
THE OLDER I GET THE FASTER I WAS
GROWING OLD IS MANDATORY GROWING UP IS OPTIONAL
User avatar
JAS
Enthusiast king
Posts: 993
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 8:27 am
Location: Christchurch

Post by JAS »

Schultz wrote:The engine bay is that awesome I had to tell you twice. rofl

Sorry about that.
Haha. Thats quite alright rofl
RiceThief wrote:
thrash wrote:is that a 1.06 rear housing? doesn't seem super laggy either, but the turbine housing looks huge(!!)
Pretty sure its a 0.82 from what Jas said on austarion, power is about right for it.
Yip. Its a .82. Power comes on very nicely :D
1320ft wrote:
OLD FART wrote:Aaron how fast would your drag car get down the 1/4 with this amount of grunt ??
My trusty slide rule says 400 hp in a 3000 lb car says 11.0 at 120 mph :D
Based on assuming the gold car has stereo etc, so I went in at 2900 lbs, it should run 11.11 @ 121.40 MPH

I want to get my car down to 2600 lbs & with 600 hp should run 9.45 @ 143.52 MPH.

Love this car though, love the build quality.

Have to have a look and a ride when I'm over for work.
Its got a decent stereo in it with one 12 inch sub. And extra sound proofing, so it would be a little heavier that a normal starion. But only 50kg or so at the most I would have thought. The sub box is made from ply so its a bit lighter than a customwood one.

I would be very happy with a mid 11 out of it in street trim but with some good sticky rubber on the back.
OLD FART wrote:Have seen it a few years ago and to my eyes it was perfect :beer
Thanks Rad. Its not. But Im a bit fussy I guess lol :roll:
1984 Sigma Super, Turbo Wagon
1990 GSR-VR 50,000ks
1984 GSR II 4G63 302kw atw at 24psi

http://www.facebook.com/marvinmartiannz

ImageImage
redzone
racking my brains
Posts: 5900
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 10:46 pm
Location: sunshine coast qld
Contact:

Post by redzone »

Almost everyone with a modified car will say it's not perfect, when to other's eyes it is. If you try & make it perfect in your own eyes, you will never want to drive it...

:beer
Fibreglass airdams $370, fibreglass front bumpers $260, reco drag links $165, alloy radiators $925 (unpolished), h/l switch rebuilds $125, all plus freight.
Coxs Automotive (07)54433507 3/5 Service st Maroochydore Q

www.facebook.com/coxsautomotive
www.coxsautomotive.com.au
WidebodyWoody
Woodwide
Posts: 3133
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 6:24 pm
Location: Gold Coast
Contact:

Post by WidebodyWoody »

Well said Dave. :beer
OLD FART
Austarion Occupant
Posts: 3448
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 1:34 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by OLD FART »

redzone wrote:Almost everyone with a modified car will say it's not perfect, when to other's eyes it is. If you try & make it perfect in your own eyes, you will never want to drive it...

:beer
There is absolutely nothing wrong with setting the highest standards in all your pursuits in life/work to aspire to and if you aim that high you may well fall a little short of the target but will end up with a far far better result than aiming waay lower and hitting the target.
Hope this make sense :)
I've had mine since 03 07 92
85 JB 2323cc DOHC 4G63
THE OLDER I GET THE FASTER I WAS
GROWING OLD IS MANDATORY GROWING UP IS OPTIONAL
User avatar
1320ft
almost postwhore
Posts: 1071
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 8:33 pm
Location: St Andrews NSW

Post by 1320ft »

OLD FART wrote: Hope this make sense :)
Ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
The Forum Parts Guy

www.vibrantperformance.com for all your performance fabrication needs

IRS OUTLAW, 2.3L VR4 Powered X235 Drag Car

Here to run out of your life & take all your money!
OLD FART
Austarion Occupant
Posts: 3448
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 1:34 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by OLD FART »

1320ft wrote:
OLD FART wrote: Hope this make sense :)
Ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Is that a yes,no or undecided :?
I've had mine since 03 07 92
85 JB 2323cc DOHC 4G63
THE OLDER I GET THE FASTER I WAS
GROWING OLD IS MANDATORY GROWING UP IS OPTIONAL
User avatar
JAS
Enthusiast king
Posts: 993
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 8:27 am
Location: Christchurch

Post by JAS »

OLD FART wrote:
redzone wrote:Almost everyone with a modified car will say it's not perfect, when to other's eyes it is. If you try & make it perfect in your own eyes, you will never want to drive it...

:beer
There is absolutely nothing wrong with setting the highest standards in all your pursuits in life/work to aspire to and if you aim that high you may well fall a little short of the target but will end up with a far far better result than aiming waay lower and hitting the target.
Hope this make sense :)
Makes scene to me Rad. For me perfect means having the details that I set right. Something very tidy, but still able to give it a hard time on the road and track. Its going to get dirty and its going to get paint chips... Everything Ive done Ive done the best I can.... And when I see it now I think Ive done just that. Well apart from one or two little things hehe
1984 Sigma Super, Turbo Wagon
1990 GSR-VR 50,000ks
1984 GSR II 4G63 302kw atw at 24psi

http://www.facebook.com/marvinmartiannz

ImageImage
redzone
racking my brains
Posts: 5900
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 10:46 pm
Location: sunshine coast qld
Contact:

Post by redzone »

I wasnt advocating settling for second best, but i have seen too many guys end up with a car that owns them, rather than the other way around..


ie


If you build a "perfect" show car, it will be something you fear driving because of stone chips....
Fibreglass airdams $370, fibreglass front bumpers $260, reco drag links $165, alloy radiators $925 (unpolished), h/l switch rebuilds $125, all plus freight.
Coxs Automotive (07)54433507 3/5 Service st Maroochydore Q

www.facebook.com/coxsautomotive
www.coxsautomotive.com.au
User avatar
JAS
Enthusiast king
Posts: 993
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 8:27 am
Location: Christchurch

Post by JAS »

redzone wrote:I wasnt advocating settling for second best, but i have seen too many guys end up with a car that owns them, rather than the other way around..


ie


If you build a "perfect" show car, it will be something you fear driving because of stone chips....
Oh, I see. And your right. As said, you need to have clear ideas about what it is your building. And about how far you are happy to push things when it comes time to drive the thing. If thats the plan...
1984 Sigma Super, Turbo Wagon
1990 GSR-VR 50,000ks
1984 GSR II 4G63 302kw atw at 24psi

http://www.facebook.com/marvinmartiannz

ImageImage
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests