Starion Safety

A place for general discussion. Catch up with mates, post pics, or if you just want to pick on e-thugs.
Post Reply
User avatar
SpidersWeb
postwhore!
Posts: 1984
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 2:29 am
Location: Wellington, NZ

Starion Safety

Post by SpidersWeb »

hahahaha

http://www.ltsa.govt.nz/vehicle-safety/ ... bishi.html

Go Starion!

"Significantly worse than average"
1997 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IV 4G63BT
1996 Nissan Maxima VQ30DE (for sale, suit someone who likes the feel of boats when driving)
User avatar
iXNAY
nearly postwhore
Posts: 1414
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 2:30 pm
Location: Bathurst

Post by iXNAY »

LOL
SR20 powered starion what have I done..... :P
Junkers
Formerly StazzyBabyYeah
Posts: 2338
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 3:16 pm
Location: Christchurch

Post by Junkers »

The LTSA tested starions :o

Depends what you hit I guess, after hearing about an accident and having one of my own I'd say the starion is a fairly good car impact wise, doesn't fold as much as the other cars which is not always a good thing I know, but it makes sure you write off that other car.. especially if it's a honda.

Seatbelts in the doors cant of helped :roll:
User avatar
SpidersWeb
postwhore!
Posts: 1984
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 2:29 am
Location: Wellington, NZ

Post by SpidersWeb »

pfft LTSA test cars, never, they're too cheap ass, thats why there is no percentages or star ratings. Its also why the Starion has the same rating as the CRX. Basically any car that can go fast, will be involved in more higher speed accidents on average, which means more people are likely to get injured. If I had a choice in an accident between a CRX and a Starion, I know which one Id chose.
The ratings were calculated from analysis of police reports on actual crashes in Victoria and New South Wales from 1987 to 2003 and in Queensland , Western Australia and New Zealand from 1991 to 2003. The ratings were calculated by a combination of the risk of a driver being injured in a crash and, if injury resulted, the severity of those injuries.
Correction - new cars are tested properly, and listed in a seperate area, but the LTSA didnt do the actual testing.
1997 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IV 4G63BT
1996 Nissan Maxima VQ30DE (for sale, suit someone who likes the feel of boats when driving)
JD_Stazza_Brendan
almost postwhore
Posts: 1131
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:46 pm
Location: Mackay, QLD, Australia

Post by JD_Stazza_Brendan »

SpidersWeb wrote:pfft LTSA test cars, never, they're too cheap ass, thats why there is no percentages or star ratings. Its also why the Starion has the same rating as the CRX. Basically any car that can go fast, will be involved in more higher speed accidents on average, which means more people are likely to get injured. If I had a choice in an accident between a CRX and a Starion, I know which one Id chose.
After seeing how much glass is in a older CRX i would hate to be in one in a crash.
SOWTZ
Mine is bigger than yours
Posts: 331
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 7:53 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by SOWTZ »

it rates the same on http://www.howsafeisyourcar.com.au/
from what i gather it is the least safe car in its class (back in the day).
on that site it also has how safe it is when the car hits people(no testing done for the Starions). anyone care to donate a Starion or them self to test this?
airbats801
Enthusiast
Posts: 737
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: oregon, USA
Contact:

Post by airbats801 »

5 point, full cage, helmet, call it good :beer
'78 Colt cp, 80 challenger "scorpion" 5spd g54bt conversion almost complete, '80 plymtouh arrow "might max" , '90 mitsu terror van "spacewagon"
80's Hero
Image
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 91 guests