Computer games don't affect kids I mean if PacMan affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetitive electronic music :D
Is that true? 2.6L, turbocharged, 152bhp? Is that at the wheels? Even still, extremely light in the loafers! Its gotta be relatively easy to bump that up considerably? Or is it just that bad of an engine?
My 'X2 HR Holden was rated at 145bhp, obviously na and with only 3L, in 1967!
Of course it is! With no boost. And the didn't say it had to be running right? Ah the Marketing gimmicks. Did not know they had 3 year unlimited mileage warranty.
bibz wrote:Is that true? 2.6L, turbocharged, 152bhp? Is that at the wheels? Even still, extremely light in the loafers! Its gotta be relatively easy to bump that up considerably? Or is it just that bad of an engine?
My 'X2 HR Holden was rated at 145bhp, obviously na and with only 3L, in 1967!
Remember, 152bhp in the UK is approx 400bhp in the USA.
bibz wrote:Is that true? 2.6L, turbocharged, 152bhp? Is that at the wheels? Even still, extremely light in the loafers! Its gotta be relatively easy to bump that up considerably? Or is it just that bad of an engine?
My 'X2 HR Holden was rated at 145bhp, obviously na and with only 3L, in 1967!
Remember, 152bhp in the UK is approx 400bhp in the USA.
Holy SHIT! That would be sweet if it were to work out like that. The '88-'89 cars were listed as 188 HP when they were shiny and new here State-side.
Put it this way, why are all the 1200Hp 4G63 DOHC Engines in the US 2.0L when they could so easily be 2.4L.......same principle applies for the 2.0L vs 2.6L Staz, its all about RPM :beer
Computer games don't affect kids I mean if PacMan affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetitive electronic music :D
