hahahaha
http://www.ltsa.govt.nz/vehicle-safety/ ... bishi.html
Go Starion!
"Significantly worse than average"
Starion Safety
- SpidersWeb
- postwhore!
- Posts: 1984
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 2:29 am
- Location: Wellington, NZ
Starion Safety
1997 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IV 4G63BT
1996 Nissan Maxima VQ30DE (for sale, suit someone who likes the feel of boats when driving)
1996 Nissan Maxima VQ30DE (for sale, suit someone who likes the feel of boats when driving)
The LTSA tested starions :o
Depends what you hit I guess, after hearing about an accident and having one of my own I'd say the starion is a fairly good car impact wise, doesn't fold as much as the other cars which is not always a good thing I know, but it makes sure you write off that other car.. especially if it's a honda.
Seatbelts in the doors cant of helped :roll:
Depends what you hit I guess, after hearing about an accident and having one of my own I'd say the starion is a fairly good car impact wise, doesn't fold as much as the other cars which is not always a good thing I know, but it makes sure you write off that other car.. especially if it's a honda.
Seatbelts in the doors cant of helped :roll:
- SpidersWeb
- postwhore!
- Posts: 1984
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 2:29 am
- Location: Wellington, NZ
pfft LTSA test cars, never, they're too cheap ass, thats why there is no percentages or star ratings. Its also why the Starion has the same rating as the CRX. Basically any car that can go fast, will be involved in more higher speed accidents on average, which means more people are likely to get injured. If I had a choice in an accident between a CRX and a Starion, I know which one Id chose.
Correction - new cars are tested properly, and listed in a seperate area, but the LTSA didnt do the actual testing.The ratings were calculated from analysis of police reports on actual crashes in Victoria and New South Wales from 1987 to 2003 and in Queensland , Western Australia and New Zealand from 1991 to 2003. The ratings were calculated by a combination of the risk of a driver being injured in a crash and, if injury resulted, the severity of those injuries.
1997 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IV 4G63BT
1996 Nissan Maxima VQ30DE (for sale, suit someone who likes the feel of boats when driving)
1996 Nissan Maxima VQ30DE (for sale, suit someone who likes the feel of boats when driving)
-
- almost postwhore
- Posts: 1131
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:46 pm
- Location: Mackay, QLD, Australia
After seeing how much glass is in a older CRX i would hate to be in one in a crash.SpidersWeb wrote:pfft LTSA test cars, never, they're too cheap ass, thats why there is no percentages or star ratings. Its also why the Starion has the same rating as the CRX. Basically any car that can go fast, will be involved in more higher speed accidents on average, which means more people are likely to get injured. If I had a choice in an accident between a CRX and a Starion, I know which one Id chose.
it rates the same on http://www.howsafeisyourcar.com.au/
from what i gather it is the least safe car in its class (back in the day).
on that site it also has how safe it is when the car hits people(no testing done for the Starions). anyone care to donate a Starion or them self to test this?
from what i gather it is the least safe car in its class (back in the day).
on that site it also has how safe it is when the car hits people(no testing done for the Starions). anyone care to donate a Starion or them self to test this?
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 737
- Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: oregon, USA
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 79 guests