Page 1 of 6

Intake manifolds: Sonata v L300

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2004 12:36 am
by NXTIME
Which manifold is better?

Please keep posts technical and share your experiences and reasons.

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2004 12:53 am
by StarionChef
Well this is an interesting thread. I havnt used either as I have chosen to design and build my own, but of those two, I prefer the L300's center inlet plenum due to its even cylinder filling and front mounted thermostat.

In my view, sonata if you want a simple install, modern look
L300 if you want to chop one down, bigger plenum
Full custom, if you wanna get serious :D

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2004 12:59 am
by Cookiemonster
Sonata.. can fit larger throttle body.. intercooler pipes are shorter and don't go over the engine.

better manifold

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2004 9:37 am
by WANTSOM
dunno :o

Manifold Type

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2004 9:51 am
by Darkelf
Sonata. The cooler pipes are shorter and don't go over the engine so there is no reheat of cool air and consequently no need to wrap pipes.

Interestingly enough was advised by DASH Motor Sports in Narrabeen to go the Sonata route as they felt this would give more power. (Shorter route, less reheat etc etc) Whether this is the case or not is unknown.

Only prob with the Sonata is the issue with the battery.

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2004 12:20 pm
by StarionChef
anyone know what dia' the runners are on both types? and is there a difference in lengh? they look sooo long

Kim,

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2004 2:24 pm
by WANTSOM
why does the Sonata manifold need a battery? :D

also, curious as to what sort of work DASH M/Sdo? (thinking Dash motors, track car etc etc)

Cheers
Greg

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2004 2:33 pm
by NXTIME
The change of battery on a Sonata manifold conversion will depend on which way you route your intercooler piping. If you go either side of the radiator, then you can squeeze the piping through between the radiator and the battery. Otherwise, if you decide to go under the headlight, then a smaller battery or battery relocation needs to be used/done.

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2004 2:40 pm
by Alspos
Would also partly depend whether you already have a cooler or not. If I did it for example I would go L300 cos pipework is already there to suit.

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2004 3:59 pm
by StarionChef
Greg, your best bet might be to put a 8v head on it, then go whatever mpi route you choose.

I think MPI could be very tricky with the extra ports on the dash head, unless you used the flange and runners off the... nah, stupid idea. get an 8v head

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2004 4:18 pm
by Project2501
The sonata manifold can be used while still using the standard battery tray. I will take pics of my setup as soon as i get a decent digicam.
What i dislike about the sonata manifold is that stupid middle nut that joins the runners to the plenum.. Cant get the fker out


cheers

tom.

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2004 10:53 pm
by toysrus
StarionChef wrote:anyone know what dia' the runners are on both types? and is there a difference in lengh? they look sooo long
Cookiemonster wrote:Sonata.. can fit larger throttle body.. intercooler pipes are shorter and don't go over the engine.
So any tech info or just words :D

Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 1:36 pm
by Project2501
no offence mate, but its not words, its experience. A forward facing t/b was the main factor in my choice between the two.

cheers

tom.

Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 6:57 pm
by NXTIME
I chose the L300 because I was planning on making up a custom plenum anyway so the forward-facing t/b would be done then. I didn't like having the thermo at the rear of the engine either. Therefore I chose th L300. I also think that the Sonata plenum is too small.

Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 7:21 pm
by toysrus
Has anyone compared/knows what the difference in terms of runners diameter and length ? ....because the L300 was setup for about 85+kw > 97 or so where as the Sonata was 77kw but then again it could just be the plenum size difference between the both ?