more evo head questions!

For all your twin cam conversion questions and hints
User avatar
Lunacy
nearly postwhore
Posts: 1355
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Land of Confusion

Post by Lunacy »

stariontron wrote:does that mean i'd be better off using VR4 pistons, if they will bolt straight to the starion rods? or will that put the comp ratio out the window?
Yup vr4 pistons have a 21mm pin which is the same as starion rods iirc. Comp ratio will be fine.
Image
enthuzed
Austarion Occupant
Posts: 3578
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 1:21 pm
Location: Melborno
Contact:

Post by enthuzed »

stariontron wrote:does that mean i'd be better off using VR4 pistons, if they will bolt straight to the starion rods? or will that put the comp ratio out the window?
VR4 & Starion pistons (Aust car not Jap import) have virtually the same crown cc (approx 14cc). The crown design is a different shape for the VR4 as its designed with clearances for 4 valves instead of 2.
Reduce fuel costs by 15-20% & cut emissions by 1/3rd...
Increase engine performance & prolong engine life...
How?
Click the website button below & watch the 3 minute video.
User avatar
thrash
Austarion Occupant
Posts: 3028
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:09 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by thrash »

what about the japo import ones? how are they different? higher compression i'm assuming?
quest wrote:
WANTSOM wrote:Personally, I find sloppy boxes very unsatisfying. I like them tight and taught to the point that if you dont have to push to get it in then its probably too old and time to get a new one :P
don't try explaining that to her tho..... just leave. lol
Adriano
I've been here before
Posts: 236
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 3:21 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by Adriano »

Jap vr4 evo ones are higher comp, and have ceramic coated crowns, plus they are quite cheap from ralliart
User avatar
thrash
Austarion Occupant
Posts: 3028
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:09 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by thrash »

do you know what comp they are? aus spec vr4 is 7.8 i've been told, and aus spec staz is 7.5.. would the jap vr4 ones be 8.5?
quest wrote:
WANTSOM wrote:Personally, I find sloppy boxes very unsatisfying. I like them tight and taught to the point that if you dont have to push to get it in then its probably too old and time to get a new one :P
don't try explaining that to her tho..... just leave. lol
stariontron
I like starions more
Posts: 198
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 11:12 pm
Location: auckland, NZ

Post by stariontron »

dwlee, cheers for the photos, how thick is that inlet manifold spacer youre using? i was hoping i could get away with a thinner spacer by removing *some* of the meat on the inlet manifold to allow the injectors to fit. also wondering what you think the best way to adapt the fuel rail to suit the new injector positions is.
dwlee
[P] Plates
Posts: 34
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 10:15 am
Location: Auckland NZ

Post by dwlee »

The spacer in the photos was original made to mate the evo4 manifold to a 4g61 head and as such is much thicker than is necessary for the evo1-3 head to evo4 manifold. The reason it is so thick (22mm) was to adapt the different port shape in the 4g61 head as smoothly as possible. The port in a 4g61 is slightly narrower and deeper than those in an evo head, but the port areas are approximately the same.

I am using the original fuel rail with the injectors in the head and not the manifold. The injector ports in the manifold are either welded closed or filled with high temperature epoxy. I couldn't see much point in using the injector ports in the manifold as the injector ports in the head would need to be filled and I did not want to do this in case I wanted to change heads.
stariontron
I like starions more
Posts: 198
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 11:12 pm
Location: auckland, NZ

Post by stariontron »

ah ok, yeah i will definitely try for a thinner spacer, just to save on cost as much as anything else

on another note, why is it that i need to mess about with the oil pump, and swap balance shafts over anyway? whats to stop me from just swapping the pistons and crank pulley, and calling the bottom end done?

loom, AFM and ECU just showed up this morning :beer
Adriano
I've been here before
Posts: 236
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 3:21 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by Adriano »

thrash wrote:do you know what comp they are? aus spec vr4 is 7.8 i've been told, and aus spec staz is 7.5.. would the jap vr4 ones be 8.5?
Yep, 8.5:1
Adriano
I've been here before
Posts: 236
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 3:21 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by Adriano »

stariontron wrote:ah ok, yeah i will definitely try for a thinner spacer, just to save on cost as much as anything else

on another note, why is it that i need to mess about with the oil pump, and swap balance shafts over anyway? whats to stop me from just swapping the pistons and crank pulley, and calling the bottom end done?

loom, AFM and ECU just showed up this morning :beer
Because the twin cam timing belt is wider, requiring the wider oil pump drivepulley, longer oil pump drive. However it has been years since i did this, so my memory is a bit hazy
User avatar
Xentro
Mine is bigger than yours
Posts: 307
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2004 11:20 pm
Location: Holland

Post by Xentro »

I just made an adapter plate and can use all 8 injectors if i wanted to..

Just 4 actually connected at the moment:

http://www.turbogarage.nl/2009/08/adapt ... -4g63.html

And some more since i'm to lazy to update my own site:
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

No welding involved.. And it fits like it was made for a Starion in the way that it goes around the brake booster. (LHD)

And yes it works.. the car is actually running and has already survived a couple laps on the Nordschleife.

I use a complete 7 bolt engine with an adapterplate to mount the stock gearbox.
a evo 4 intake, evo 6 turbo with home made manifold
a evo 3 wire loom that i modified so it suits a starion and use a evo 8 Ecu because they are easy to reprogram.
A evo 4 ecu is possibly the worst ecu to pick, because you can't reprogram them. Evo 1-3 can be chipped, evo 5-8 can be flashed.
Evo 9 up has different plugs.
-------------------------------------------
83 2000EX runner.
88 2.0 Black Widebody DOHC evo 6 turbo at 1.7 bar
88 2.6 White Widebody. spun a bearing.
06 2.0 Lancer Wagon. daily driver.
stariontron
I like starions more
Posts: 198
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2004 11:12 pm
Location: auckland, NZ

Post by stariontron »

Adriano wrote:
stariontron wrote:ah ok, yeah i will definitely try for a thinner spacer, just to save on cost as much as anything else

on another note, why is it that i need to mess about with the oil pump, and swap balance shafts over anyway? whats to stop me from just swapping the pistons and crank pulley, and calling the bottom end done?

loom, AFM and ECU just showed up this morning :beer
Because the twin cam timing belt is wider, requiring the wider oil pump drivepulley, longer oil pump drive. However it has been years since i did this, so my memory is a bit hazy
ah ok thanks. i guess i could try and get cheeky and run my starion oil pump and belt off the dohc pulley, but possibly not the best idea

does anyone know if the dohc 4g67 bottom end is similar to the dohc 4g63 in this respect? (crank, pulleys, oil pump etc). found one in bits for cheap
fugazi
Enthusiast
Posts: 716
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 10:30 pm
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Contact:

Post by fugazi »

Xentro wrote:... the car is actually running and has already survived a couple laps on the Nordschleife....
Bastard! That would be a dream cometrue.... :D
Laptime?

Nice work w.the mani-adaptor!
Image
OLD FART
Austarion Occupant
Posts: 3448
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 1:34 pm
Location: Brisbane

Post by OLD FART »

fugazi wrote:
Xentro wrote:... the car is actually running and has already survived a couple laps on the Nordschleife....
Bastard! That would be a dream cometrue.... :D
When I win LOTTO that's where i'm heading to get some lessons from the Queen of the Nurburgring Sabine Schmitz :D

PS I want to beat her Ford Transit van time
I've had mine since 03 07 92
85 JB 2323cc DOHC 4G63
THE OLDER I GET THE FASTER I WAS
GROWING OLD IS MANDATORY GROWING UP IS OPTIONAL
User avatar
Xentro
Mine is bigger than yours
Posts: 307
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2004 11:20 pm
Location: Holland

Post by Xentro »

OLD FART wrote:
fugazi wrote:
Xentro wrote:... the car is actually running and has already survived a couple laps on the Nordschleife....
Bastard! That would be a dream cometrue.... :D
When I win LOTTO that's where i'm heading to get some lessons from the Queen of the Nurburgring Sabine Schmitz :D

PS I want to beat her Ford Transit van time
Well she always seems to be there "cruising" the ring
Image

Obviously faster then this :D
Image
-------------------------------------------
83 2000EX runner.
88 2.0 Black Widebody DOHC evo 6 turbo at 1.7 bar
88 2.6 White Widebody. spun a bearing.
06 2.0 Lancer Wagon. daily driver.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests